with all due respect to an awsome man, gotta laugh.. what don't you want to talk about buzz ?.... on exo-politics de-sensitizing propaganda on popping comets to "keep the publics interest" ???....that's for sure ! "we keep building up the Russians space program"... what's that about ? but he don't believe 'carbon da blame' for things ...a bit of a mixed bag of bullshyte ? things go really nuts at 3.00 minutes....and his body language he looks a man that has re-surfaced from a remarkable journey,but can't ^.
this may help to connnect the dots to buzz's sureal reality projection
Last edited by aether on Sat Apr 28, 2012 4:43 am, edited 1 time in total.
Joined: Mon May 03, 2010 5:31 pm Posts: 885 Location: London, UK
Thanks for that aether. Just a question , 'What about the moon landing, happen or not'? With many subjects today every side is covered, it happened, it didn't, then in the end nobody knows what the truth of the matter is. We all end up confused or a lot of people just believe whatever source they go to without investigating for the truth!! I have found that some media and alternative media really spin a good story without even being in a troubled spot theirfore having no right to speak with such authority and that really gets me annoyed! Sorry if I went off topic a bit.
from my perch coralann, and all that see a moon landing conundrum that has become undebatable, with zaney, ex-high profile scientists, engineers and pilot astronauts spruking propaganda from the bowels of the decievers who controll the technology (A) as opposed to the technology (B) that us masse's are privilaged to slowly intoxicate ourselves with
has man /nasa /who everrr... been to moon, or where everrr, for that matter, lots of problems for only skin and boned, space not-suited astronaut's to be achievable,radiation exposure for example, let alone navigation, propulsion, communication, elemental protection dynamics and a combination of contemporary science's , enhanced with off-planet stellar travel technology from who knows where ?, keeping mindfull of the exotic technologies that have been toyed with by breakaway post war societies such as the > vryal< with a whole swagg off majik tricks ,derived/stolen from pretty much other time/space place's.. if you care to look ,even > tavistock institute < is probably not privy to where ' that energy ' comes from...but it's there, no doubt
information concerning the 'mass deception' regarding the 'construction' of the vision and audio for the assumed live transmission, viewed through local analogue television recievers globaly during (or after movie studio production) the first moon landing frogshyte in 1969 would have been a huge electrical engineering challenge imagine the technical savy needed for such a feat, connecting the world via moon to nasa in 1969 ....live !
unless puters and their power chip processors were ' secret tech' in 69, the shear size and weight of the ' valve amp ' transmitter/reciever electrical equipment was imposible to carry from earth through space to the moon....why did not succeeding missions investigate old landing sites ?..are the old shuttles not there ?, nor missions after the apparent hoax apollo 11, even been executed ? too many loose threads to nead into a ball, hard to believe anything under focus, so i don't, unless of course homo-erectus recieved assistance for such an endevour if the facts change, so shall my mind http://www.syti.net/UFOSightings.html#anchor359160
Joined: Thu Nov 24, 2011 9:16 pm Posts: 107 Location: The last Soviet State
There are many possible explanations on this:
1: According to Dr. Rauni Leena Luukanen, our technology is supressed with at least 50 years and therefore we don`t know anything about the current technology. That means that they had all the technology that we have today, back then.
An explanation of the pictures with almost no stars in them taken from the journey, is that the moon has an atmosphere. According to Bill Cooper the moon has an atmosphere.
2: The moon journey was a fake, and it was all captured in a secret movie studio.
3: The moon landing took place, but for reasons that we don`t know, they could not show this to the public. The fake moon landing had to be broadcasted, so the taxpayers could salute themselves.
Joined: Mon May 03, 2010 5:31 pm Posts: 885 Location: London, UK
Thanks for all the info aether and ja, very interesting indeed! Like I said all sides are covered now of a story and then you just don't know what to believe but one thing I do know they are a lot further on in technology than we all know about so anything is actually possible!
Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 2 guests
You cannot post new topics in this forum You cannot reply to topics in this forum You cannot edit your posts in this forum You cannot delete your posts in this forum You cannot post attachments in this forum
Login
FAQ
Search
