What would you call it?
Why would it matter what I call anything? Is it the name, the content or something else entirely that defines a thing?
I thought I was asking what you meant when you called "it" the "no name philosophy", not the other way around; are you going to explain, or do we have to go in circles some more?
I don't resonate with it.
Could you please explain what this means?
I don't understand how I would give Notice with it.
What do you want to give notice of, and why?
I don't know what it is, or how I would communicate with it as I haven't researched it.
If you haven't researched "it", what made you arrive at the conclusion that "it" is a "no name philosophy"?
Are you able to see how it would relate & succeed in my endeavours here, had I begun with it instead?
I believe only "you" can answer that question, as I don't believe I can read the mind you're using for intent, understanding etc...
That the name is being used on each side of a jurisdiction line. Whatever Dean has done there was a timing and a resonance for me.
I believe divergent thinking ("thought process or method used to generate creative ideas by exploring many possible solutions") can benefit us all; so could you please help me understand what this Dean fellow is doing?