The CrowHouse Forums

In modern times certain intractable conflict situations may first be brought to a cease-fire and are then dealt with via a peace process where a number of discrete steps are taken on each side to eventually reach the mutually desired goal of peace and the signing of a treaty. A peace treaty also is often not used to end a civil war, especially in cases of a failed secession, as it implies mutual recognition of statehood. In cases such as the American Civil War, it usually ends when the armies of the losing side surrender and the government collapses.

By contrast, a successful secession or declaration of independence is often formalized by means of a peace treaty.

Where was the treaty signed? There was no treaty signed to end the Civil War.

Martial Law does not cease during the hostile occupation, except by special proclamation, ordered by the commander in chief; or by special mention in the treaty of peace concluding the war, when the occupation of a place or territory continues beyond the conclusion of peace as one of the conditions of the same.

Both the Lieber Code and the Hague Regulations of 1907, which took much of the Lieber Code and wrote it into the international treaty law, did comprehend practices that would be considered illegal or extremely questionable in this day and age.

I have been looking into this one to see if it applies in the UK as on all my Bank Cards ect my name is in capital letters also when receiving a court summons in capitol letters however when i write my name i write it in lowercase.

Can anyone help on this ????

31 “If I bear witness of myself, my witness is not true. "

41 “I receive not honour from men.
42But I know you, that ye have not the love of God in you.
43I am come in my Father's name, and ye receive me not: if another shall come in his own name, him ye will receive.
44How can ye believe, which receive honour one of another, and seek not the honour that cometh from God only?"

In keeping with helping to build an era of love and peace we have a decision to make.
We either keep on keepin on doing as we are complying with the government laws or we choose to serve God of love and be in compliance with the laws of the Universe.

To put it simply, and many have said they serve God, but, are they willing to stand firm on that to the extent they are prepared to put thier life on the line. I cannot say but will say, as far as some of us can tell, unless one is prepared to do that his words and intent mean diddly.

What I am saying is, we do have the choice to serve God and that message has been conveyed. To be taken seriously though it seems we will have to be prepared to die. Not that anyone will die but that until one takes the stand he is prepared to, he will not be taken seriously.

In other words, it seems unless one is prepared to put his life on the line to save his soul he will loose his life meaning, remain in the box, in debt, and regulated.

I will elaborate further in the coming week or so. Til then, know we are preparing to take the final stand and that we believe it will result quickly in the freedom from the box we seek. In short, we are standing for love and nothing less than.

Where there is love THERE IS NO CONTRACT THERE IS NO LAW THERE ARE NO DEBTORS OR DEBTS OR BILLS OR MORTGAGES. All things are free meaning, cost goes out the window.

The reason I ask is because the only bills and court summons I've ever received have been addressed to a name; not the living human being using the name...

I bet if I asked you if you were a name you would probably say no; but then why do so many people claim to be a name when they go to court? Could identifying as a name be consenting to be governed? If the names we use are copyrighted and/or "owned" legally (fictionally), would we be granting jurisdiction by identifying as a name? Or worse, could we be labeled as enemy combatants for identifying as a name the state claims to own?