The CrowHouse Forums

Hi everyone need your advice ! PLEASE Stay in that topic

I was arrested for speed and it turn ot the cop arrest it me for obstruction
the first thing the cop did is to touch my vehicle and i ask him why he touch the car and he reply it was a procedure and i ask him why he was arresting me his reply was for speed then i start doing stupid thing with my mouth buy arguing with him that his radar was not calibrate because i was not speeding and then it turn out i was sitting in the back of his car and 20 min latter he let me go
3 month later the cop from vancouver serve me with a summon (obstruction of pease officer)
my first court appearanc is 25 of october 2011 in richmond bc and even i try to read your post and watch the video i am still not sure how to react or go about it .


Yesterday i whent to court requesting full disclossure
to conclude when reading the disclosure that the crown =goverment
the RCMP filled a request to the crown to charge not me but the Man
and all the script from the officer (a lot of lie on how the even had happen)

can someone help me with this ?
\what i understand is that they are claiming againt the legal entity no me the man but by me going there and argue that the cop was in wrong makes me guilty and a trustee

how do i approach this

i sorry that its basicly new to me but for the pass i have been studing all about "Who we are" and sometime i get confuse


All help is very appriciated.

So essentially when this goes to court, the judge will see the complaint and the "facts" of the evening (i know how you feel about the 'facts' being lies, it is happening to me also).

As you seem to know, it doesn't matter what they are claiming against you, just that you don't argue with them, and cause a controversy. We always need to ACCEPT what the judge is saying to us, but ask for proof of claim/contract etc... in regards to what the judge has said.

In my opinion, you will need to adjourn the case for a later date, generally 4 weeks later (in the courts i've been to anyways). Simply because you need more time to produce an affidavit (default judgment), which will stand as evidence that the Crown and the acts and statues they are trying to enforce, have no power over you.

You will need to send a notice to the Attorney General, that is worded well, and sets up some assumptions, which you indent not to be rebutted, that will become your proof of no contract with the Crown.

You need to address some basic points,

1. Birth certificate being proof that you are the sole share holder in your legal person
2. Identify who the attorney general represents (and doesn't represent - Queen Elizabeth II of the House of Windsor. Also identify them as a public servant.
3. Appoint yourself as the administrator and beneficiary of your account.
4. State that evidence against your understanding/belief/assumption must be provided in ## days/business days/calender days.
5. No response will be seen as agreement to the contents of the notice.

Do not try to deal with this in court, until you have an affidavit or similar supporting documents lodged into the court record. You also need to file a motion to dismiss along with your affidavit.

Once this paper work is in the court file, then you can go and deal with the matter.

I suggest that when your court date comes up, you do not claim your power of administration, but go along with the presumption, and request an adjournment. This should give you more than enough time to get the documents sorted, and allow you to do more research and gain more confidence in your position of being a man under no one but God.

_________________
It's already within your reach, you just need to know it's yours

No, please.... I appreciate your input. I've been expecting to hear your thoughts in deans trust law forum about my notice.

I've got nothing... I read one of your other post saying a similar thing, so i made sure i didn't mention it in my notice. I'm really just basing it on what dean has said.

Perhaps the way to go about this then, is to just say that a corporate entity, the legal person XXXXXX XXXXXX was created for I the man, Xxxxx Xxxxxx to use in commerce. This gets around actually defining what the birth certificate represents/is proof of, but stays as a true statement that i don't believe can be rebutted.

Check out my notice in Dean Cliffords trust law thread to see how i'm approaching this process.

_________________
It's already within your reach, you just need to know it's yours

thank live free for your advice! evrything sound great it open my mind to see things clear but i am still in the fear to screw everything up. If i go this way, i dont understand why it is so hard for me to understand and set it in my brain all this process. Its like going in path in a darkness i just watched on you tube" UNGRIP" video an it made me more confuse but i did found a lot of logic but i am
do you know any link that i could see some example of how to write to Attorney general
type of example thank again !

Hi D: i was stop on 30 April 2011 and i receive the summary three weeks ago
they said the arrest fro obstruction after the 18 september 2011
when you say "send the court" you mean The crown concil correct?
by register mail ?
thank you very much for your help

Good advice deacus.

You shouldn't need to go to the trouble of writing to the attorney general to get this matter sorted.

_________________
It's already within your reach, you just need to know it's yours

Good support here!
I think keep it simple, one step at a time but attack with each immediate step and grow. Treat it as an opportunity - I did when census came my way, I thought ok the government has come to me so now I as Man begin my attack's on this alien energy invading our Earth.