MasterChiefa wrote:
Chris wrote:
My agent in commerce CHRISTOPHER PAUL COLE.
What evidence is there that you own the "agent in commerce"?
If someone/something else claims they own something and you claim to own the same thing, could you be contributing to the creation of a controversy? Courts deal with controversies, right? If so, why risk it?
I think this post might helpThanks Masterchiefa,
There is evidence of harm!
About ownership, well it looks like another ship - of owners.
Let's say a way to see what is going on is to see that things are 180 degrees about face - so we have harm instead of no-harm.
Spelling - example; live, veil, evil. What about own ~ now. Maybe one of the tricks to take us out/away from living in the now where there is no-harm, is to program us into believing instead that we own things/are owned and our common vessel is the ownership.
So what would be the opposite of life/living - corpse. Show me evidence that we/people of the townships are not operating as corporations.
For me Dean Clifford clarified what is going on, plus the timing of this was a breakthrough for us.
I've also been wondering about the court, feeling for the right thread to break free. If/when there is risk so be it, if I had played safe my spirit would be long dead.